A Common Denominator

A change of mind by Norman Delanty in May-June 2001 from a course of action he had decided upon which if he had gone ahead would not have led to the medical negligence charge he will now be facing from the Petitioner

It needed a second appeal to the Ombudsman under Freedom Of Information to get Beaumont Hospital to release the file And all documents were not released by Beaumont Hospital in the file they released Those documents were in chronological number order for the time period and had Norman Delanty refused to release a document the numbering would be out of sequential order so the was no non release of documents for the time period in question 2001-2002

As in Spring 2002 Norman Delanty had admitted to a fellow consultant  he was as he called it partial responsibility for what had happened And the petitioner on receiving that confirmation in writing from the petitioner’s surgeon and Norman Delanty’s fellow consultant wrote to Norman Delanty asking him to abide by his original decision and a copy was sent to the petitioner’s GP at the time who has subsequently released back that letter to the petitioner That particular letter was not on the main Beaumont File. Both the surgeon’s letter and the letter sent to Norman Delanty in spring 2002 are available as proof of how the events happened So on a process of elimination Norman Delanty has to have a correspondence file with that letter on it and one has to ask what other correspondence?

A search done on Mitchell 62 Butterfield avenue 1950-1086 and on it in the 1960’s were Patrick Mitchell and a Carmel Mitchell well that was the person he married however she was in America It would appear to be Isabella Smyth taking the name of his first wife like that until 1970 and then you had a Peter I Mitchell added matching the Peter I Smyth found born 1950 He now lives in Dalkey as Peter PA Smyth Then you had added Edmond G Mitchell born 1952 He now lives on Wellington Road and is a consultant in Beaumont Hospital practices and qualified as Edmond B Smyth He is registered as a doctor as Edmond Smyth However has rooms in Blackrock Clinic as E Bruce Mitchell Who in 2007 said he was Margaret Mitchell’s son and by inference Barry White’s cousin Neither any relation to Barry White as they are the sons of Isabella Smyth who died December 2013 And Pat Mitchell was an in law Now the only way they could be related is if Peter C Kennedy born 2nd quarter of 1946 was Pat Mitchell’s and then these persons would be half brothers now that would be an interesting scenario

Now Edmond B Smyth has to be aware of the Data Protection Act as when Nemesisone was having one of three MRI scans after surgery 2003 a Dr Smyth came into the scanner room, as the radiographer called him and the radiographer said “I will drop that file into you later” what file was Dr Smyth looking for? As under Data Protection Act he had not got the right to Nemesisone’s file Nemesisone did not think it unusual at the time as Barry White up to that point 2003 or publicly since that Nemesisone is aware ever admitted Edmond Smyth was related to him, And the Data Protection Commissioner has reprimanded hospitals for allowing doctors see files for people of which they not the doctor And those three scans totally refute what Ciaran Foley said November 2016 and the judge hearing the case replicated in a cut and paste job done from the transcript

According to a former employee of Barnardos’ Tracing Agency what Barry White had decided on in April 2001  was a common thread in Ireland to inform a person at the funeral or the wake they were not the deceased’s child. As was the initial placing of a distant cousin in a relations family to replace a child who had died in that family

 Norman Delanty’s change of decision was in May June 2001 Barry White also had a change of mind in April – May 2001 on a decision he had made in April 2001 after his mother’s death and he then backtracked on it  And the one common denominator in both of those change of decisions was Rosemary White nee Mc Donnell who as already said was very anxious in May 2001 to find out the name of Norman Delanty Irrespective of what her motive was as the petitioner could see at the funeral mass that Nerys Ryan given her grand public entrance to the mass was no different to Rosemary White nee Mc Donnell she just played a different game.

Why did Barry White agree well first of all the will of his mother was unsigned and the letter was attached to the will second of all the letter would have contained reference to the events of 1997-1998 when approached his mother to make a settlement on Nerys Georgina Ryan out of the trust and she refused on the basis she would have to lie and say that Nerys Georgina Ryan was the petitioner’s  it was then she spoke to Aideen Monson who then made the vague reference to the petitioner about events 10 years earlier   And last of all it gave Barry White access to a large sum of money and if he was to fulfill his wife’s aspiration to become a judge he would need supplementary income from somewhere  How is the petitioner aware of Rosemary White’s aspirations well at a meeting in March 2003 Barry White made the comment that been a judge was like semi retirement and  Rosemary White made the comment “Barry you will like it that is why I encouraged you to apply” Barry White also made the comment to the petitioner “our parents are the only ones we have you have to forgive them” The petitioner did not challenge that comment at the time However at a meeting in September 2004 the petitioner asked Barry White what he meant by the comment and he lied and denied saying it   The petitioner did comment to Rosemary White in Summer 2002 after he was appointed a judge  how was Barry White going to fund his children’s  education as a judge As they were still very young and Rosemary had aspirations for them all to attend the top fee paying schools in Dublin Rosemary White said she had an insurance policy out The petitioner is not aware of insurance firms paying for a drop in income whatever about a loss of income So what is covering those expensive fees?

Why Norman Delanty reacted to Rosemary White’s bully tactics  in May 2001 if that is what happened only Norman Delanty can answer that one However a letter was added to the Beaumont file where one of Norman Delanty’s registrars stated categorically they had met the petitioner in February 2003 and the petitioner was neither out in Beaumont hospital nor did they met the said registrar And the petitioner’s proof of that is the same signed time sheets  which are available for inspection can be substantiated by bank account payments for the salary to match the hours worked and confirmed by the Recruitment consultants who placed the petitioner in the company concerned So Norman Delanty reacted to something to take such imprudent action

Impersonation

 

Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher

This person or let us say the person who used the name is dead she was Barry White’s mother

Proof she existed

When the petitioner spoke on the phone to Cliff Brasher Deloitte London in November 2005 and said that Jacqueline Rushliegh Belcher was dead his response was “that is a very serious allegation you are making” The petitioners response was “the documents are available to prove it and have you met the said Jacqueline Belcher in the last 4.5 years” Cliff Brasher did not answer that question Deloitte London wrote a letter to the petitioner in January 2007 confirming the phone conversation between the two said parties had taken place in November 2005

Proof Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher was impersonated

The petitioner then based on those comments sent a flyer letter in November 2005 to the address given for Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher in 1994 court registered documents Well two days later the petitioner gets a phone call from Barry White seeking a meeting the petitioner agreed and told Barry White the meeting would be taped He arrived at the meeting 40 minutes late with Hilary White and one other person who it was later shown was an impersonator of Brian Mc Caffrey The impersonator was 5ft 10 inches in height dark hair heavy build age category late forties early fifties As per Brian Mc Caffrey’s neighbour and local newsagent Brian Mc Caffrey is 5ft 4in in height grey haired slight build and aged 65 years The petitioner has three Dictaphone tapes of the two hours and ten minutes meeting in which the impersonator made three comments, any voice recognition analyst will be able to tell whose voice those comments came from

Michael Walsh a Garda in The Bureau of Fraud Investigation said that type of impersonation becomes a crime when documents are submitted claiming the person named signed off on documents saying they were in attendance when in fact they were not and as a result money was obtained by fraudulent means. It was the result of that meeting that led to the settlement Barry White on his daughter Nerys Georgina Ryan in the last quarter of 2005 The mother of the daughter is Nerys Ryan senior Also in the same time period Nerys Georgian Ryan altered her birth certificate which no longer shows Barry White as the father Only time will tell whether that was part of the fraudulent settlement As the 1995 book of condolence of Barry White’s father was signed by Nerys Georgina Ryan in the name Georgian Ryan White and when the petitioner asked Barry White why she was signing in that manner Barry White’s response was “ her birth certificate gives her the right to do so”

And since the comment by Aideen Monson/White was in 1997 or 1998 about events 10 years earlier . Did Nerys Ryan on hearing what Rosemary White nee Mc Donnell was saying around Dublin ask for an increase in payments for her silence which Barry White paid out of his income as a barrister until his mother died and then in 2001 out of the trust which he then had total control of and – went against his mother’s wishes to dissolve the trust on her death- . If that is the case then Nerys Ryan Senior and Nerys Georgina Ryan  were fully aware in 2005 that the monies Barry and Rosemary White paid them came from assets that were not theirs to give

Hilary White’s role in all of this was to take on the mantle of the late Jacqueline Belcher as Barry White could not submit death certificates for Jacqueline Rushliegh Belcher Hilary White is the one who has documents lodged with Companies Registration Office Ireland which conflict with paperwork lodged in the Courts Service with Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher signature on it The Petitioner has a record of all the documents The Relevant Tourist Authority lodged with the Companies Office with Hilary White’s signature on it  The Petitioner also has all the documents lodged in The Probate Office signed by  Emily G White as Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher When the petitioner made known her comment on the impersonation the Petitioner saw Hilary White in January 2010 walking past Penney’s Dun Laoghaire with what seemed to be to all intents and purposes a minder so what was that about?