A Paper Trail

 

Everything a person does leaves a paper trail here is some of the paper trail left by the persons involved in these frauds

Circuit Court Case in respect of the father of Nerys Georgina Ryan and subsequent maintenance payments

Terminology used to describe these type of cases is usually child maintenance or child support

Court Record Number – 270/89

Date of Case – 12^th June 1989

Judge Hearing the case – Judge Spain

Complainant– Mother – Nerys Ryan

Child- Minor – Nerys Georgina Ryan

Respondent  – Father- Barry White  

As Barry White lost the case and was ordered to pay a weekly  payment  of £26 until Nerys Georgina Ryan turned 18 and was  shown by a DNA test to be the father those test results are in the court record of the case As already said these records are in the public domain and open to any person wishing to access them

Also uploaded and attached to this blog are the following

The amended Birth Certificate of Nerys Georgina Ryan

The Rosemary White Foundation registered with Companies House UK

A CRO Document showing an example of Barry White’s writing lodged with the Irish Companies Office

The Death Notice of Freda Mc Donnell

The Death Registration Of Freda Mc Donnell

 

“Landlord for the Duration of the Lease”

This is a picture of one of the petitioner’s possessions which was withheld by the landlord and is currently sitting in the backyard of the house the Petitioner was in The Petitioner has the receipt for this item and bank statement to match the direct debit payment The flowers in the foreground were also bought by the Petitioner and the Petitioner also has the receipt for it, to confirm they purchased them

  In June 2004 the Petitioner wrote to Deloitte Dublin in respect of any trusts they may hold for the Petitioners benefit in the following few days the Petitioner was in their sitting room talking to Enie and a man walked past on the Ginnell A letter came back from Deloitte Dublin  dated 18^th June  2004 denying aspects in the present tense although the Petitioner had also asked in the past and present tense on the basis they believed at that point fraud had been perpetrated

In October 2004 the Petitioner spoke to Tom Day Lisneys who asked me why was they paying rent on the house they was living in The petitioner said no one had told them anything different Tom Day was in December 2004 in reply to a letter from Hughes Murphy solicitor saying while he was not aware of a property portfolio he could not comment on a trust fund that letter went missing from the house out of a locked filing cabinet however another copy existed and  the Petitioner has now got a copy in their files again

 Detective Garda Sean Allen also asked the Petitioner why they were paying rent on the house they were living in and did no one ever tell you that you were adopted/fostered

 Richard O Neill architect Newbridge Co Kildare in November/December 2004 said why are you paying rent on that house who homed the Petitioners dog

 The Petitioner stopped paying rent in March 2005 as the money from their loan was running out and the Assistant Manager Harry Briscoe AIB 101 Grafton Street suggested stop paying rent and see what happens The Petitioner did that and heard nothing until June 15^th 2005 where a man called to the Petitioner’s door calling himself Maurice Sherling In appearance he looked like the person walking on the Ginnell the previous June 2004

 The Petitioner had to take that at face value as they had never met the landlord The Petitioner asked him into the house and told him what had happened and said they were trying to resolve matters to little avail to date Mr Sherling gave the Petitioner until 15^th September 2005 to come up with the money The Petitioner said there is an irony that is the first anniversary of the date the Petitioner approached Barry White on the matter at the insistence of Garda Sean Allen nine months down the road at that point there had been no resolution In August 2005 Nessa Mr Sherling’s secretary asked the Petitioner to confirm the meeting in the previous June in writing that was done

• 23-08-05 The Petitioner Saw Barry White standing against the wall looking out towards the sea opposite the house Grehan 

On the 30^th September 2005 The Petitioner had only €10 in their purse and had to sell their car the following Monday 3^rd October the Petitioner went on social welfare the following week

• 03-10-05 The Petitioner saw Barry White walking against them on the lower pier in Dun Laoghaire 7.55pm approx head bent forward looking at the ground as the petitioner passed by on the upper pier

On Friday 6^th October The Petitioner first of all got a phone call from Nessa asking why no money had gone into Mr Sherling’s account the Petitioner said they had not got it had tried to resolve matters with the White family to little avail Mr Sherling would have to take legal proceeding’s against the petitioner. Nessa said are you going to take legal proceedings against Mr Sherling, The Petitioner said “no he can take them against me” 

At@ 2.50pm The petitioner got a phone call from Maurice Sherling who told them if they were not out of the house by the following Wednesday 12^th October 2005 he would come and forcibly evict them Mr Sherling did not carry out that threat

Later that evening 06-10-05 The petitioner saw Barry White walking against them on the lower pier in Dun Laoghaire 7.45pm approx head bent forward looking at the ground as the Petitioner passed by on the upper pier about 200 metres later The Petitioner saw Mr Michael Cotter Managing Director Park Developments walking against them on the upper Pier

• 09-10-05 The Petitioner saw Barry White walking against them as the petitioner was coming down onto the lower pier at 8.05pm approx he touched the side of his nose as the Petitioner walked within 10 feet of him

The Petitioner got a letter from Mr Sherling in mid November along the same lines which was given to their solicitor On the 12^th December 2005 The Petitioner got a notice of termination by Landlord, however it was incorrect as Mr Sherling only gave them 28 days notice to quit when he should have given 42 days. Mr Sherling was informed of the fault in his notice to quit he did not reissue a correct one.

Under Standard Letting Procedures of Private Rented Accommodation

1. The Landlord has to giver notification in writing that his rent is owing and he expects payment within 14 days
2. If the tenant does not pay up within that time period the landlord has to give 30-48 days notification in writing to the tenant to vacate the premises depending on the length of the tenancy
3. If after that 30 days the tenant has not left the premises the landlord has to take legal proceedings

On 12^th December 2005 Mr Sherling signed a notice to quit with his secretary Nessa that was two days after The petitioner had spoken to Chris Brasher Deloitte London in respect of the London trust and had sent him a follow up letter On 19^th December 2005 the Petitioner got a letter back from Redmond solicitors advising the Petitioner to seek independent legal advice in respect of the London trust

Maurice Sherling made a mistake on his notice to quit as the notice period for a tenancy 18 months or more but less than two years has to be 42 days so on a technicality Mr Sherling has to issue a new notice to quit with the correct notification period on it. 

In March 2006 the Petitioner got the first correspondence from Lennon Heather asking them to quit the property The Petitioner replied giving the details they had to date In April-May 2006 The Petitioner started getting correspondence from the PRTB and an adjudication meeting was set up for 14^th June 2006 The Petitioner asked to see the Deed of Sale of the property Lennon Heather took one out of the file Mr Sherling examined it and gave it back to his solicitors The Petitioner noticed it was an original as the government stamps went down the right hand side of the page and were coloured Mr Sherling asked could the Petitioner could get social welfare rent allowance the petitioner got the document from social welfare and posted it back to Lennon Heather it was not followed up on

 The Petitioner subsequently got a copy of the Deed of Sale which was different from the one produced at the adjudication meeting the stamps were across the top of the page and Maurice Sherling was named as the Grantor and someone called Caplin was named as the Grantee Now Mr Sherling said at the adjudication meeting he had bought the house off the builders Mc Coy so they should have been down as the grantor not Mr Sherling The PRTB said the Deed of Sale was outside their remit

There was a court case in the circuit court 20^th December 2006 to which the Petitioner was given three days notice the petitioner got into the court room at seven minutes past ten due to delays on the Dart to find the case had been decided by Justice Linnane before the list was read and then she had gone on to the list of cases The Petitioner appealed the case but did not put a stay on the circuit court decision as they had no solicitor at the time to advise them on correct court procedures The Petitioner went back to the house 16^th January 2007 to find the house had been repossessed it again not the norm as the landlords solicitor Lennon Heather had got the circuit court to implement the decision 12^th January and had gone done to the Sheriffs office 15^th January 2007 The Sheriffs office told the Petitioner out of courtesy they normally write out and give a written seven to fourteen days notice the Petitioner got none The name of the barrister representing  the landlord in the Circuit Court Case according to the Bar Council June 2009 was Jennifer O Connell BL

 After taking their property out of storage the Petitioner found that  possessions were looted from the house between 16^th January – 8^th February 2007 The Petitioner got an interlocutory injunction 19^th January so until the court case 30^th January 2007 nobody had the right to enter the house The landlord for the duration of the lease was a Mr Maurice Sherling and his barrister said in court on the 30^th January that all her client wanted was vacant occupancy so he could sell the house he did not want the Petitioners possessions – that never happened as the house has subsequently re let as a Lay Litigant found out afterwards – The Petitioner was given until 14^th February to remove their possessions The name of the barrister representing  the landlord in the High Court Case according to the Bar Council June 2009 was Jennifer O Connell BL

 On Monday 5^th February 2007 the Petitioner got a phone from their solicitor at the time  saying he had heard from Lennon Heather who wanted the Petitioners possessions out of the house by that evening The Petitioner had at that point not found a storage unit they did so by the following day and Lennon Heather were informed by the Petitioner’s solicitor of that fact And the agreement 6^th February 2007 was that the Petitioner would be allowed oversee the removal of their possessions at 10.30am Thursday 8^th February 2007

The Managing Agents Sherry Fitzgerald and solicitors Lennon Heather went back on an agreement made 2 days earlier 6^th February 2007 that the Petitioner could oversee the removal of my possessions. On the 8^th February 2007 at 10.20am the Petitioner’s solicitor at the time  got a phone call from Sherry Fitzgerald saying the Petitioner was not allowed oversee the removal of their possessions. The lease between the tenant and the landlord for the duration of the lease Maurice Sherling, said “the landlord had no right to take the tenant’s possessions in lieu of unpaid rent”

In respect of one item belonging to the Petitioner a couch when it came back out of what was supposed to be storage when sat on it would squeak The Petitioner asked in the shop where it was bought what could have caused that and they were told if it was stored on it’s side and they would collect it after Christmas 2007 an see what could be done The Petitioner never heard anything subsequent to that The shop owner used to be the owner of Cassidys in Georges Street – one of the Dunnes Stores family – In the last week July 2010 the Petitioner had some chairs recovered again ones that were supposed to be in storage And they showed the couch to the upholsterer Who said the frame was damaged and could not be repaired – The Petitioner has no proof their furniture went into storage as they were not allowed oversee the removal of their belongings

Inventory of contents in the house when The Petitioner moved in 13^th February 2004

Kitchen

 

• A kettle that didn’t work
• Three saucepans not matching two had lids
• Three mugs none matching
• Two glasses free with petrol
• Assortment of cutlery not matching
• Ironing board that could not stand on it’s own
• Iron that didn’t work
• 2 un matching dinner plates

Main Room

 

• Two seater three piece suite with springs broken and dirty loose covers
• Basket work dining room table and chairs which had a plate glass top which moved every time you touched it
• Pine coffee table which had ingrained dirt on which could not be removed
• Wooden garden shed shelves
• Four framed poster pictures

Main Bedroom

 

• One double bed which the base and mattress did not match and the springs were broken in the mattress
• Two MDF grey blue bedside lockers
• Two broken bedside lights

Small Bedroom

• No furniture

David McKay handyman to Maurice Sherling, removed all, of the above items from the Petitioner’s house in the third week of February 2004 David Mc Kay said he was bringing what he removed up to the local tip head whether he did so the Petitioner does not know.

The only items that the Petitioner overlooked were a wooden salt and pepper set in the Kitchen cupboard and the toilet brushes in the upstairs bathroom and the cloakroom

The carpets on the floor were filthy the Petitioner had to engage professional industrial cleaners to shampoo them

All of the contents in the house 16^th January 2007 were the Petitioner’s they had bought them and had the receipts to confirm it The Petitioner also had to buy a washing machine as the one in the house was broken beyond repair

The eviction was invalid on the following grounds

1. Maurice Sherling was not the owner he was only the landlord for the duration of the lease as per the letting agreement However all the court documents submitted by Lennon Heather solicitors state he was the owner
2. The Circuit Court judge Justice Linnane 20^th December 2006 held the case before the list was read not standard court procedure
3. The Sheriff gives out of courtesy a 10-14 days warning by letter before repossessing a house the Petitioner got none the Bailiff repossessed the house one day after the Sheriff’s office supposedly had been notified
4. The lock and barrel the said Bailiff changed was the Petitioner’s they bought it in June 2005 and could sue whomever changed it for damages up a minimum of €30,000 for that
5. The landlord or their representatives used a duplicate set of keys and broke into two locked filing cabinets belonging to the Petitioner and items and documents were stolen from them that is illegal and carries a custodial sentence

The Petitioner also found their laptop was opened and documents deleted off it in the time period 16^th January -8^th February 2007 that is computer hacking

Stonewalling

 

The petitioner at that point was in contact with Garda Sean Allen Dun Laoghaire although he appeared to be dragging his feet So the Petitioner wrote to his Superintendent who wrote back saying Garda Sean Allen would be sending on a report No Copy ever arrived On the same day Garda Allen rang the petitioner and suggested they set up a meeting with Barry White well the courts were closed and Barry White was away for all of August so in September 2004 the petitioner managed to arrange a meeting with Barry White 15^th September 2004 The Petitioner had spoken to Detective Garda Sean Allen to say the meeting had been arranged and he advised them to be direct and to the point with Barry White The petitioner arrived at 8pm as arranged

Well what is all of this about – Barry White

I will come straight to the point who are/ were my parents – Petitioner

You know who your parents are/were Barry White

Not any more I have done a lot of research in the last 6 months and your parents are not the names coming through in the research – Petitioner

What type of Research – Barry White

Sitting down and writing out all the companies markets and sectors I had analysed in my time period as a business analyst and a surname and a particular person kept reoccurring which the people at the time I was doing the research seem to think I should know – Petitioner

What were the names – Barry White

That is the question I am asking you What did you mean by the comment you mad eot me March 2003 “Our parents are the only ones we have no matter what they have done you have to forgive them – Petitioner

You are putting a strong emphasis on words – Barry White

Yes Barry that is how you said them – Petitioner

I didn’t say it – Barry White

Yes Barry you did are you and your wife Rosemary who was in the meeting at the time prepared deny that under oath in court – Petitioner

Barry White did not respond to that comment

The context of the 2003 meeting was I was looking for your accountants contact details as I had been registered for income tax in 2002 and I wanted to establish who had done so as I had not Your were referring to a funeral of a friend of your who had died and how his son had got up at the funeral mass and said ”his father for all his faults was the only one he had – Petitioner

I did not say that comment are you sure have you notes kept – Barry White

Barry White yes you did and I do have notes kept and how could I know the details of funeral I did not attend – Petitioner

I did not say it – Barry White

Yes you did – Petitioner

Do you know anything about an account that was set up using my name and birth details by person/s other than me – Petitioner

No – Barry White

Are you sure – Petitioner

Why do you ask – Barry White

I was advised to see clarification from the four main banks as to whether there was an account in my name I was not aware of Three of the main banks said no the fourth after a 24 hour time lapse asked that I come back with a letter from the Garda confirming I had reported the incident – Petitioner

Which Bank was it – Barry White

It was not AIB or Ulster and that leaves you with two other – Petitioner

The bank in the current economic climate is just been cautious – Barry White

It is not the bank that has gone through recent difficulties and therefore did not have the need to be cautious – Petitioner

Who asked you to talk to me – Barry White

The Garda – Petitioner

What Garda have you spoken to and was it an official complaint – Barry White

Yes Barry as far as I am concerned it is an official complaint and it is none of your business what is the name of the Garda concerned A letter has gone to the Garda in question requesting written confirmation that I reported this to them and a follow up letter to his Superintendent – Petitioner

What made you do all of this – Barry White

As a result of a lot of personal research I believe fraud has been carried out against me- Petitioner

I was not involved in any fraud or cover up – Barry White

I would not like to think you were involved in the fraud however had you any part in covering it up – Petitioner

No – Barry White

The meeting held 3^rd September 2003 that was not told to all the parties in advance of its holding and no agenda or minutes were released and at the end of it where Derval White said to you “thank you for that Barry” Hilary White when asked afterwards what she meant by that said “ Derval is always thanking people”

I don’t remember her saying it and you know myself and Derval do not get on – Barry White

Yes Barry you did say it and I know your feeling for Derval are negligent and not existent Also Cliona White was in the sitting room and not in the room with the others at the end of the meeting with the doors between the two rooms open why was that?

I assume you mean negligible and not negligent – Barry White

Barry White gave no response as to why Cliona White was in another room and listening to the meeting through open doors

I acknowledge Derval only she and I never got on – Barry White

Who do you believe was involved in the fraud – Barry White

Cliona Derval and Niamh 

– Derval as you know in the time period was in deep financial difficulties having got involved in a BES scheme on a pub purchase with three other people As you know if you pull out of a BES scheme early you repay the entire amount Derval at that point was on a Bankruptcy charge or had a bankruptcy charge against her All of a sudden in Spring 2003 Derval White debts were cleared and she was driving around in an Audi A4 convertible – Petitioner

Barry White gave no response to those comments by the petitioner

Barry White if this issue is not resolved amicably I will report the matter to your overall superior The Minister for Justice – Petitioner

That is your choice to do – Barry White

The remaining seven minutes of the meeting referred to surgery the petitioner had in 2000 and its successful outcome and to all the events that surrounded it in the time period 2000-2001

Well Barry we are getting nowhere here However, I have done what I was asked to do by the Garda I have asked you to face the truth and admit this fraud you have refused to do so – Petitioner

The meeting ended after 35 minutes

Three times during the meeting Barry White’s children came in and out of the French doors in the room where the meeting was held even though it was dark outside Each time they would run through the room one child in particular would turn around and say hello to the petitioner At one point towards the end of the meeting Rosemary White came into the room she acknowledged the petitioner and said why she was in room to look for a room heater for her father who was in the house at the time

On 16^th September Garda Sean Allen rang the petitioner to ask how the meeting had gone

“Barry was not prepared to come clean on the matter” Petitioner

“He would not confirm anything” Garda Sean Allen

“No nothing ”Petitioner

“ He admitted nothing” Garda Sean Allen

“He admitted nothing” and “ I have a written transcript of the meeting which I will drop up to you over the next few days”

The petitioner dropped up the typed transcript of the meeting 15^th September 2004 between Barry White and the Petitioner to Garda Sean Allen by Sunday 19^th September 2004

On the 20^th September 2004 the petitioner received for no apparent reason a phone call from Hilary White

Have you spoken to Barry White in the last few days – Petitioner

No – Hilary White

Well I meant what I said if these issues are not resolved I will report this matter to the Minister for Justice – Petitioner

Think carefully about the consequences of your actions – Hilary White

I have thought about what I am doing you get Barry White to contact me to resolve this issue – Petitioner

Barry White rang that evening and left a message on the petitioner’s land line The petitioner returned his phone call the next morning

Barry I am returning your call – Petitioner

What do you want to talk about – Barry White

A follow up to our meeting last Wednesday – Petitioner

You will hear nothing different – Barry White

Well I see no point in meeting you for a repeat of that – Petitioner

The petitioner  was subsequently advised not to attend a  further meetings with Barry White by Enie a migrant worker who lived in house number 8 in the development  with her husband Alex and two teenage children and had befriended the petitioner in February 2004 Enie in the six months she lived in the house gave the Petitioner a copy of her Eircom bill and her work registration as confirmation of who she was The petitioner did not ask for this documentation Enie for some reason seem to believe the Petitioner might need the documentation So the Petitioner held onto the copy of  Enie’s work registration and her Eirom bill and still has them in their filing system

Enie and her family lived in house number 8 until the start of October 2004 when the family moved to England her son stayed on in Dublin until the following  June to finish his school exams

Log of calls to confirm the Meeting 15^th September 2004

13^th September 2004

The petitioner ringing from their landline to Barry White

The petitioner then ringing from the same landline Garda Sean Allen to confirm the meeting would be taking place the following Wednesday 15^th September 2004 and Garda Sean Allen advised the petitioner to be direct and blunt in dealing with Barry White and ask him straight out what was the situation and what was his position on it

16^th September 2004 Garda Sean Allen ringing the petitioner to ask how the meeting had gone

Notification to Garda Allen

The transcript dropped into Garda Sean Allen by 19^th September 2004

20^th September 2004

Hilary White ringing the petitioner on their landline for no apparent reason

Barry White ringing the petitioner on their landline and leaving a message on voice mail

21^st September 2004

The petitioner ringing Barry White from the petitioners landline

Eircom have already informed the petitioner once they have notification of the dates involved in the calls they can confirm the incoming calls to the landline and what phone numbers the calls came from The petitioner can confirm their outgoing calls

“The Laws are only for the Little People”

 

Using a paraphrase on words of  the late Leona Helmsley who said “Taxes are only for the little people well “Laws are only for the little People” is how Barry and Rosemary White have attempted to justify their fraud slander libel and defamation

As in the same time period last quarter of 2005 that they perpetrating their fraud slander libel and defamation in negotiating a settlement for Barry White’s daughter Nerys Georgina Ryan by Nerys Ryan The petitioner had contacted Cliff Brasher Deloitte London Redmond Solicitors who were the solicitors for the late Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher despite Barry White claiming she was still alive One that basis the Petitioner had sent a flyer letter to the address on the Probate Details of Desmond Murray for Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher and within two days of posting the letter to Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher the Petitioner had a phone call from Barry White seeking a meeting that afternoon It can be proved that Barry White made the call to the Petitioner as Eircom have confirmed that they hold records of incoming calls to a phone line and details can be released on request

It was the result of that meeting that led to the settlement Barry White on his daughter Nerys Georgina Ryan in the last quarter of 2005 The mother of the daughter is Nerys Ryan senior Also in the same time period Nerys Georgian Ryan altered her birth certificate which no longer shows Barry White as the father Only time will tell whether that was part of the fraudulent settlement As the 1995 book of condolence of Barry White’s father was signed by Nerys Georgina Ryan in the name Georgian Ryan White and when the petitioner asked Barry White why she was signing in that manner Barry White’s response was “ her birth certificate gives her the right to do so”

The impersonator of Brian Mc Caffrey was by all accounts   – from the research carried out by the petitioner at the suggestion of the lay litigant, who even suggested some firms to look into the employees of a solicitor whose Christian or surname do not match the name of the person Barry White introduced him as  practising in a firm with offices on the same Quays as the licensed vintner The Inn on the Quays Sine e and a Dance School now called The National Dance Studio of Ireland since moved to Crowe Street His description was confirmed by the Law firm in question own  receptionist and given his correct name to Focus Ireland where the person said he worked his description also matched the person Focus Ireland had doing  voluntary work for them  As that is what the person said at the end of the meeting stating he knew what it was like to be homeless And Focus Ireland were given the name Brian Mc Caffrey on 31st December 2006 and asked was he a member and they said No And Focus Ireland  were then given the name of the solicitor  from the solicitor’s firm based on the same Quay as Sine e and The Inn on the Quays And they said that person did do voluntary work for them and they naturally could give no more information on him unless  forced to do so through disclosure in the courts

So as Michael Walsh a Garda in The Bureau of Fraud Investigation said that type of impersonation becomes a crime when documents are submitted claiming the person named signed off on documents saying they were in attendance when in fact they were not and as a result money was obtained by fraudulent means. So if Brian Mc Caffrey – as it appears to have happened according to Maurice O Donoghue – Revenue Commissioner – has  signed off on documents claiming to be in attendance at the meeting 26th November 2005 when in fact he was not  and making an assessment of a person he never met Then that is a fraudulent act as Brian Mc Caffrey would then be an accessory to the fact of fraud

The transcript released under “Do as I say and not as I do” were the full details of the meeting The only items left out of the discussion were

1) The fact a listening device was in the petitioner’s house Barry White laughed and scoffed at that However the Petitioner in January 2007 had a lay litigant in their house who was also a former subversive who found the listening device and Having found it and all block it’s signal and then removed the device within five minutes of the blocking of the signal a car arrived with three men in it two got out and started running around the back of the house The lay litigant went out to speak to them and asked had they any problem and told them he was just doing some electrical work in the house

2) The exchange between Emily G White as Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher and Louise Walshe which the petitioners Private Investigator has already confirmed and has advised the Petitioner to ask their solicitor to write to the Garda in respect of a gun licence held by Barry White’s father which was decommissioned in the 1980’s Based on information the Petitioner gave their Private Investigator about events within some of the time period the gun licence was held The exchange between Louise Walshe and Emily G White ran from 1967-1987 and a financial affiliation from 1990-2001

The only other two items left out were

1) The access to the Petitioners house by persons other than the petitioner for whatever disharmonious means  As paperwork  were stolen from filing cabinets and books in the house were stolen, internal doors were left open that the petitioner had closed when they had left the house The petitioner reported one of those incidences to Dun Laoghaire garda station who at the time period the location of the house fell within December 2006 and the Petitioner has the Garda who called to the house business card with their name and number on it, the date of the report and what was reported

2)  Who the Senior Counsel was in the case taken by Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher the Petitioner had named one particular silk in asking the question which it turned out subsequently was not the barrister involved The actual Senior Counsel representing Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher went on to become a judge and take a senior role in the Judiciary  ex officio as far as the highest court in the land And yet he heard a case taken by Barry White and his family in 2007 which they lost. However the judge in question as the Petitioner’s solicitor said a few months after the case was won by the Petitioner in an answer to a question on the possible conflict of interest the judge should have excused himself from the case if he was conflicted

It is the intention of the Petitioner to take legal action if necessary Private Prosecution against any parties who have been accessory to the fact of fraud or who have accessed the Petitioner’s files stolen or otherwise – such as been given open access to them by other parties without the permission of the petitioner

“Do As I say Not as I do”

Meeting 26 November 2005 In attendance Barry White BW Hilary White HW a person introduced as  Brian Mc Caffrey?  and Petitioner
This is an almost complete transcript  from the meeting -2 full tapes and one quarter complete – are available to confirm the details This meeting was the result a letter the Petitioner sent 12 days earlier The Petitioner  got a phone call from Barry White at approx 10.20 that morning to set up a meeting that afternoon, The Petitioner  told him the meeting would be taped with the petitioner’s  Dictaphone as the petitioner  knew he would stonewall on the matter as he did originally 15 September 2004

Petitioner initially refused to let the said Brian Mc Caffrey into the house as Barry White introduced his as a psychiatrist Hilary White said he could go to into another room Petitioner said it was a small house there were no other rooms Petitioner said Brian Mc Caffrey could leave, he said he come with the others otherwise he would have to sit in the car Petitioner gave him that option or offered a short cut back to the  dart station which the said Brian Mc Caffrey refused to avail of In the end after a discussion of about seven minutes on the doorstep Petitioner told  the said Brian Mc Caffrey if he came into her house if it was in a personal capacity which the said Brian Mc Caffrey agreed to
It turned out that  the real Brian Mc Caffrey was 5ft 4 inches in height grey hair slight build and aged late sixties according to a description sought by the petitioner In January 2007  from his neighbour and his local newsagent whereas the person who called to the house and was introduced by Barry White as Brian Mc Caffrey in November 2005 was 5ft 10 inches in height heavy build dark haired and aged late forties early fifties The petitioner had gone to get a description of the said Brian Mc Caffrey at the the suggestion of the petitioner’s solicitor at the time  who said “go and sit outside his registered address and see when he comes out is he the person who called to your house” Well that is what the Petitioner did however he never came outside his registered address not did he answer his doorbell which the Lay Litigant who was with the petitioner rang  That is why the Petitioner looked for a description from Brian Mc Caffrey’s neighbour and local newsagent

The Petitioner turned on the Dictaphone and put it on the coffee table in the middle of the room Then Petitioner started to read  from the list of questions and Barry White asked to see a copy Petitioner was reluctant to give to a copy and when  the Petitioner asked for its return at the end of the meeting Barry White refused to hand it back
Are you the father of Annette White buried in the Angels Plot Glasnevin Cemetery? August 1958 Petitioner

No BW

Is Hilary White the mother? Petitioner

No BW

If that is so why did Kevin White give the names of the parents as Peter and Francis White Petitioner

Don’t know BW

Have you Petitioner made any effort to contact the Coombe BMcC

I have and I have their reply Petitioner

Could I see it BMcC

The petitioner ignored the request

Is Hilary your cousin? Petitioner

No BW

 Is Geraldine Kennealy her mother? Petitioner

No BW

Is Nicholas her twin brother? Petitioner

No BW

Is Cliona White a full sister to the late Annette White? Petitioner

No BW
Were Margaret Murray and Eileen Murray Bligh* the children of Desmond Murray Roebuck Park house and Emily G White born 2/3 February 1959? Petitioner

At that point the Petitioner had not got the death certificate of Eileen Murray Bligh as it was not relevant, The petitioner  subsequently got it. That woman was a 76 year old spinster who died in 1968 Evelyn Murray was the other twin died in 1961

No BW

Did your mother contest the will? Petitioner

No BW
  Jacqueline Rochford Belcher was appointed administrator in January 1989? Who is she? Was that a persona for your mother? Petitioner

You have obviously been to the probate office BW

I have Petitioner

  The will was subsequently contested on 11 September 1989? On behalf of a named witness Margaret Murray. Who contested the case? Petitioner

Nothing Happened BW

Who supported the claim? Petitioner

Nothing Happened BW

Those answers did not make sense Petitioner

Did you appear in court or swear any form of affidavit on behalf of the deceased Margaret Murray? Petitioner

You are focussing on Brian BW

That is the way I was trained Petitioner

The Petitioner’s training was based on someone who always told them to access the capabilites of the people they would be meeting and that is what the petitioner was doing with the said Brain Mc Caffrey as they focussing on him 

What consultant was called to declare the ill health of the deceased Margaret Murray? Was it Hugh Staunton? Petitioner

No BW
   
If so on what basis? Given that the Murray twins were now both dead Petitioner

No BW
. 
 Was the petitioner the person put forward as Margaret Murray. If so why was the petitioner not called to court? Petitioner

No BW

Who won the case? Petitioner

Don’t know BW

 Is my natural mother Louise Walshe a lesbian ? Is she in a relationship with any of your sisters Derval or Niamh White  Petitioner

No BW

Could I see the letter from the Coombe BMcC

The petitioner  went upstairs to take down my file on this fraud and showed it to the letter to the said Brian Mc Caffrey 
The petitioner took downstairs some extra Dictaphone tapes with them

The hospital would not release the Para of the child and the age of the mother as the petitioner would need the permission of the natural mother and given that your mother was  registered on the birth details of 1966  registration as  the mother of the child born in 1957  that would be a hard thing to do Petitioner

I will give you permission to see the records I am her daughter HW

Now  the person purporting to be Brain McCaffrey did not seem to know what Para meant, so the Petitioner had to explain to what was supposed to be a qualified doctor what that meant. The first or subsequent child As the petitoner believed the records would show that the Para was the first and the age of the mother 15 years showing who the real mother of that child was Hilary White

Did Louise Walshe/Annie White ever make any attempt to contact the petitioner throughout the nineties. If so what happened the letters? Petitioner

No BW  Did your mother Emily G White aka Jacqueline Rushleigh Belcher live off that income from the 1989 court case and the 1994 Probate submission for the rest of her life? Petitioner

No BW

How much did she spend? Petitioner

No BW

 What happened the letter the petitioner believes  Emily G White  left with Stephen Maher for their attention, to be given to the petitioner after she died? Petitioner

No BW

As Garda Sean Allen said to the Petioner in Summer 2004 “Did she not leave you letter telling you all of this” The Petitioner’s response was well if she left me a letter I did not get it”

How much did Niamh Derval and Cliona White get in January 2003 when they perpetrated fraud using my corrct birth details and another surname? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

How much did they spend? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Who else knew about the fraud at that time? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW
 
When did you Mr Justice White find out? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

What did you do to cover it up? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Why did you cover it up? Why didn’t you tell me? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Did you approach Padraig Cronin in September 2003 If so on what basis did you do so? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Why did you never tell the petitioner that the Deloitte trust existed? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Are you telling the petitioner Barry White you have never set foot in the Deloitte building you have never met Padriag Cronin or any staff member of Deloitte Petitioner

I don’t even know where Deloitte is BW

It is opposite UCD Earlsfort Terrace Petitioner

You mean the Concert Hall HW

Barry White attended college at Earlsfort Terrace he should know where it is located Petitioner

Having paid back the money to KPMG/ Redmond’s what happened the rest of the money? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Did it go into a bank account in AIB 101 Grafton Street under the business name Catriona Walshe? With the main beneficiary been the petitioner  Petitioner

 Nothing happened BW

Who were the trustees?  On what basis were trustees appointed? Petitioner

No BW

How much money went into the account in September 2003? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

How much money is left 26 months later? Petitioner

Nothing happened BW

Who am I actually renting this house from? Petitioner

Your landlord  BW

As I would like to see the title deeds to see who the previous owner was prior to Maurice Sherling Petitioner

You are not entitled to see those BW

Once I see those it will show me who the previous owner is if there was one  Petitioner

 As any person I spoke to in respect of this fraud including Tom Day Lisneys and the Detective Sean Allen asked me do you not own the house you live in? Petitioner

Have you read Petitioner your lease BW

  Who sold the house to Mr Sherling? Petitioner

Have you read your lease BW

When I changed the locks to the hall door in June 2004? Having come back  from a walk to find a heavy smell of perfume in the house. Did you or any member of the White family get a duplicate key and if so from whom? Petitioner

No BW

Why were you evasive with me 15 September 2004? Petitioner
I wasn’t BW

You were Petitioner

Why did you not tell me the truth? Petitioner

I did BW

You did not Petitioner

The person purporting to be Brian Mc Caffrey made few one of his few interventions at thid point he appeared to want to change the subject he asked  about the drudgery jobs the petitioner  had lost since they had moved to the current house as to what the petitioner felt was the reason. The Petitioner said the first loss was down to a demoted manager as the Petitioner had told their line manager they  was taking the afternoon off, and had th eeline manager’s permission however the demoted manager  also wanted to be informed. The second the Petitioner did not knowpsoosble to doi with the fact the backlog had been cleared and the work was then only part time however the company had emplyed a full time person and the third down to a multinational looking for cheaper overseas labour and closing down a department and therefore the temporary staff would be let go first

Why were you passing me on the Dun Laoghaire Pier three times October 2005? What did you mean by the indication of rubbing you nose? Petitioner

I have not been walking there for months BW

Do you have contact details for a representative of my natural parents? Petitioner

No BW

If so can I have the contact details please? Petitioner

I don’t have any BW

What age were you when you started school BW

I don’t know Petitioner

When did you make your first communion BW

Five the same as my grandmother  Petitioner

That was very young BW

Who is your grandmother HW

I knew her as my Aunt Kate Petitioner

There is a picture of you and Mary Angela in the front sitting room HW

That picture is not of me it was taken in late summer early Autumn 1959 could have been August 1959 printed on the slide Petitioner

That is a picture of the Murray twins Petitioner

Kate was my mother’s sister HW

She was not she was her first cousin Petitioner

Who was her mother HW

Emily Mc Hugh Petitioner

And who her father HW

Pierce Brosnan Petitioner

Do you mean the actor HW

No, he was an RIC officer who was transferred to Dublin after the birth of my grandmother and he died in 1911 in an IRA skirmish he is buried up in the Dublin Metropolitan Police Plot in Glasnevin cemetry The plot is beautifully maintained Petitioner

Have there been any negotiations on this fraud? If so for how long? and what is the end result? Petitioner

No BW

1. If your answers to all of these questions are stonewalling or evasive are you prepared to take bloods against me? Petitioner

Yes if you pay for them HW

I have no money Petiitoner

1. Do you hold a full file on me relating to all these matters? If so I would like it Petitioner

No BW

As the meeting ended after one and three quarter hours  the person purporting to be Brian Mc Caffrey told the petitioner he worked in a social capacity for Focus Ireland so he knew what it was like to be homeless and if the petitioner ever wanted to talk to him about anything they could. The Petitioner said  “I will not be taking you up on that offer” As the three went out the door Hilary White asked the Petitioner to put on my outside light The Petitioner said it is already on